What counts as misconduct?
Excessive force, false arrest, unlawful detention, unlawful search, retaliation, police shooting, Taser misuse, jail force, denied medical care, or failure to intervene may support review.
We Preserve The Proof Before The Official Story Wins
If police used force, arrested you, searched you, or held you in custody unlawfully, the first question is not whether you are angry. It is whether the evidence supports a constitutional claim.
The useful first answer is practical: preserve proof, get medical care, identify the constitutional issue, and review the criminal record before the official file becomes the whole story.
Excessive force, false arrest, unlawful detention, unlawful search, retaliation, police shooting, Taser misuse, jail force, denied medical care, or failure to intervene may support review.
Most claims use 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, with Fourth Amendment, First Amendment, due process, or custody standards depending on the facts.
Yes, if the facts show that an officer or other state actor violated your constitutional rights while acting under color of law.
Most police misconduct lawsuits are brought under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, but governmental immunity, Monell, criminal-case overlap, state notice, and evidence preservation need immediate review.
It costs nothing to find out where you stand.
We identify the real issue quickly: force, arrest, search, retaliation, custody harm, shooting, failure to intervene, or municipal accountability.
Punches, tackles, Tasers, pepper spray, K-9s, shootings, restraints, or force after the person was controlled.
Stops, arrests, handcuffing, jail booking, or detention without a lawful basis supported by the record.
Vehicle searches, home entries, phone searches, frisk issues, consent disputes, and warrant problems.
Denied medical care, failure to protect, excessive force in custody, jail video problems, or death in custody.
What officers did, what reason they gave, whether you were free to leave, and when force or search occurred.
Medical care, photos, pain, work loss, emotional harm, scarring, disability, or other documented damage.
Bodycam, dashcam, dispatch, reports, court files, witness names, complaint forms, and records to preserve.
Whether the facts support Section 1983, Monell, state-law claims, or a different next step.
Past results do not guarantee a future result. They show the level of accountability cases our team is built to handle.
Actual review excerpts discussing Detroit police, a civil-rights issue, and a federal trial involving police officers. Every rights case still depends on the record and defendants involved.
This firm went above and beyond to help me get closure, and the ability to move on from a terrible interaction with the Detroit police. I would highly recommend them to anyone who needs a civil rights lawyer.
I hired mr trainor for civil right issue and I was impressed by his humbling performance and professionalism
Sean Cabot went above and beyond for me during trial in a federal court. He was going against Warren, Michigan officers and two defense attorneys.
The Official Record Is Not The Whole Story.
Independent proof, complete records, and the right legal path can matter more than the first official account. We preserve the evidence and build the case from the facts.
Use this quick screen before body camera, dispatch, criminal-case, or internal-affairs records get harder to obtain. No sign-up, no dollar estimate, and your answers stay on this page. The result is general information, not legal advice.
Question 1 of 5
Tell us what happened. We will look at the force, stop, search, arrest, custody issue, evidence, medical proof, and whether the case is likely to survive the defenses.
Get safe, get medical care, preserve what you have, and let us evaluate the records before the official file becomes the whole story.
A police misconduct claim often turns on records controlled by the same institutions being accused. Preservation comes before argument.
Bodycam, dashcam, jail video, business cameras, doorbell cameras, and bystander phones can show the sequence better than reports.
911 audio, CAD logs, radio traffic, use-of-force reports, arrest reports, and supervisor notes show what officers claimed and when.
ER records, urgent care, imaging, specialists, injury photos, scars, restrictions, and work notes prove harm and timing.
Policies, training, prior complaints, discipline history, and similar incidents may matter when municipal liability is part of the case.
Most Michigan police misconduct cases are civil-rights cases. They turn on whether the conduct violated the Constitution or federal law, whether the defendant caused harm, and whether the claim can survive immunity defenses.
42 U.S.C. Section 1983 requires action under color of law and a deprivation of federal rights.
Graham v. Connor judges force by objective reasonableness based on what officers knew at the time.
Monell requires a policy or custom that caused the violation. A failure-to-train, supervise, or discipline theory generally also requires deliberate indifference, causation, and ordinarily a pattern of similar violations.
MCL 691.1407 can affect state tort claims and is reviewed separately from federal Section 1983 claims.
Claims involving the State of Michigan or state agencies can carry separate Court of Claims requirements under MCL 600.6431.
Charges, pleas, dismissal, suppression, and Heck issues can affect probable cause, timing, and damages, but they do not end every force or search claim.
Agency reports, internal review, government lawyers, and video retention clocks begin moving while the injured person is still trying to understand what happened.
Meet by phone, video, or at any of our Michigan offices.
Every case at Christopher Trainor & Associates is a team effort. Our attorneys collaborate on strategy, discovery, and litigation so you get the full strength of the firm behind you—not just a single lawyer. We have built our practice on this collaborative model since 1989.
Meet Our Attorneys