Reach Us 24/7

Call 248-886-8650 Now

ct-logo-new2
posr-img

In an effort to keep drunk drivers off the road, police officers have resorted to using random checkpoints to find drunk drivers.   At these random stops, officers will look to see if they can find any drivers who they believe are driving intoxicated and those drivers are subsequently arrested and charged with DUI.  While officers continue to use these checkpoints, the Supreme Court held in the City of Indianapolis v. Edmond that using checkpoints for the sole purpose of finding drunk drivers is unconstitutional.  If you are facing a DUI charge, it is absolutely essential that you hire a DUI attorney in Detroit who understands this case law and knows how to attack the use of these unconstitutional checkpoints in court.

The Key to Attacking the Constitutionality of DUI Checkpoints
It is important to note that the use of checkpoints in and of themselves is not unconstitutional.  Police officers often use checkpoints when looking for wanted suspects or to find unlicensed drivers.   In order for your DUI attorney in Detroit to challenge the constitutionality of the checkpoint, your DUI lawyer in Detroit must be able to show that the sole purpose of the checkpoint was to find and catch drunk drivers.

City of Indianapolis v. Edmond also requires that in order for a DUI checkpoint to be found unconstitutional, the purpose of the checkpoint must be found at the “progommatic level.”  This means that testimony from street officers who may have been assisting with the checkpoint will not be sufficient.  Your DUI attorney in Detroit must question an officer who was in charge of the operation’s plan and implementation (such as a sergeant).

Using Questioning to Attack the Checkpoint’s Constitutionality
In order to attack the constitutionality of the checkpoint, your DUI attorney in Detroit will question any testifying officers as to the purpose behind the checkpoint.  The questioning may proceed as follows:

DUI attorney in Detroit: Sergeant, did you conduct the DUI checkpoint?

Police Sergeant: Yes I did.

DUI attorney in Detroit: And did you plan the checkpoint?

Police Sergeant: Yes I did.

DUI attorney in Detroit: So you were the one who determined when and where the checkpoint would be held?

Police Sergeant: Yes I did. I have planned a number of checkpoints in the past and was in charge of this one as well.

DUI attorney in Detroit: A total of 3 people were arrested at this checkpoint, is that correct?

Police Sergeant: Yes there were.  That’s how many we typically get at a checkpoint like this.

DUI attorney in Detroit: What do you mean by a checkpoint like this?

Police Sergeant: A checkpoint to find drunk drivers.

DUI attorney in Detroit:  So are you saying that was the purpose of this checkpoint? To find and prosecute drunk drivers?

Police Sergeant: Absolutely.

Here the DUI attorney in Detroit is able to successfully demonstrate through the use of cross-examination that the officer being questioned was on the “progommatic level” (that is that he planned, supervised, and carried out the checkpoint) and that the sole purpose of the checkpoint was to find and arrest drunk drivers.  Under City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, the DUI checkpoint used in this case would be unconstitutional.

Contact Us
If you have been charged with a DUI after being stopped at a police checkpoint, call the Law Offices of Christopher Trainor & Associates to discuss your case with one of our DUI lawyers in Detroit.  Call our office at 800-961-8477 to schedule an initial consultation.

Related Posts

Selecting the Ideal Juror

Selecting the Ideal Juror

It is crucial to select the right jurors to hear and ultimately decide your future...

DUI: An Overview

DUI: An Overview

Your drunk driving arrest has thrown a wrench into your life. You have never been...

Detroit, MI - Suspect Charged After Victim's Death

Detroit, MI - Suspect Charged After Victim's Death...

Detroit, MI (August 10, 2023) - A Detroit man faces several counts related to a...

Previous PostNext Post

Get Answers From Experienced Lawyers

We are available for free consultations in person, via Zoom or through FaceTime.

Name(Required)
Required Fields *
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
map-white-lake

White Lake
Main 

9750 Highland Road
White Lake, MI 48386
248-886-8650White Lake
map-flint

Flint 

336 W First Street
Flint, MI 48502
810-234-5678Flint
map-kalamazoo

Kalamazoo 

251 North Rose St., Ste 200-6013
Kalamazoo, MI 49007
269-447-2200Kalamazoo
map-ann-arbor

Ann Arbor 

2723 South State St. Ste 250-15096
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
734-882-2646Ann Arbor
map-grand-rapids

Grand Rapids 

250 Monroe NW, Ste 400-706039
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
616-591-3700Grand Rapids 
map-southfield

Southfield 

2000 Town Center, Ste 1900-1237
Southfield, MI 48075
248-886-8650Southfield 
map-lansing

Lansing 

120 N Washington, Ste 300-5101
Lansing, MI 48933
517-546-2279Lansing
map-bay-city

Bay City 

401 Center Ave, Ste 25
Bay City, MI 48708

989-262-0787Bay City
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram